Cooney v. American Horse Shows Ass'n, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
FACTS
Plaintiff, a horse trainer who is a member of defendant American Horse Shows Association, Inc. [“AHSA”], brings this antitrust action challenging his suspension pursuant to certain disciplinary regulations of the defendant. Specifically, he contends that the defendant’s “Rule on Drugs and Medication” [“Drug Rule”] creates a standard of liability which is unreasonable and arbitrary, and therefore violates sections one and two of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Justice v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1983
- Theodore Brenner, D/B/A Teddy Brenner Enterprises v. World Boxing Council and Jose Sulaiman ChagnonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Casse v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lindemann v. American Horse Shows Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.