Legal Opinion

Haas v. Opelousas-St. Landry Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 26, 1928No. 29435PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

The defendant has moved this court to recall the writ of review that issued herein for the following reasons:

“1. That no assignment of errors accompanies the petition or application for said certiorari, or writ of review, as required by statute and the rules of this court.
“2. That said petition is verified, not by petitioners as required by statute and the rules of this court, hut by their attorney.”

The first ground assigned for the recalling of the writ is not tenable. The application for the writ clearly states the errors relied upon to reverse the Court of Appeal. There was no occasion,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coignet v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. J. Landry & Son v. LabarreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. Landry v. PoirrierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Horvath v. EpplingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Stubbs v. FlemingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Petrie & McFarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Jackson v. Petrie & McFarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API