Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Petrie & McFarland

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1931No. 31330PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The writ of review in this case was granted at the instance of the defendant, firm of Petrie McFarland. The respondents have filed a motion to rescind the order because the petition for the writ was not verified by the oath of either member of the defendant firm, but by the oath of one of the attorneys for the firm. It is contended by the respondents' attorneys that the statute on the subject, section 2 of Act 191 of 1898, p. 437, requires that a petition for a writ of review shall be verified by the affidavit of the petitioner, unless he be absent from the parish in which the judgment sought…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. Landry & Son v. LabarreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. La Societe de Bienfaisance des Arts et Metiers v. William B. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
  3. Landry v. PoirrierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. North British & Mercantile Ins. v. SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. Stubbs v. FlemingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davies v. Consolidated UnderwritersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Long v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Pipes v. GallmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. Miller v. Powers & Tuttle, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API