Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Bishop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, entered on the 9th day of October, 1914, as granted counsel fee, etc.

1Per curiam

The court had no power to grant counsel fee after a final judgment dissolving the marriage. (See Lake v. Lake, 194 N. Y. 179.) It follows that so much of the order as is appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lake v. . LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Haakenson v. ColdironWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Dolby v. DolbyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bishop v. BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Dumproff v. DumproffNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Wright v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API