Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Wayne County

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1968No. Calendar 30, Docket 51,615PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

(for reversal). Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed before trial on defendant county’s motion for summary judgment. The motion for summary judgment, filed, pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1), asserted that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. It was, in other words, the equivalent of that which, under our former bench practice, would have been presented by a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. See Durant v. Stahlin (Appeal in re Van Dusen, Elliott, Romney) (1965), 375 Mich 628, 642-644.

Plaintiff, as special administratrix of the estate of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Jewell v. Rogers TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Mullins v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Lynes v. St. Joseph County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Lynes v. St. Joseph County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Mullins v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Weckler v. Berrien County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API