United States v. Landerman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
This direct criminal appeal involves, among other things, a challenge to the district court’s refusal to allow a prosecution witness to be cross examined regarding his alleged bias. Finding that the limitation of cross examination resulted in a violation of the Confrontation Clause and that such error was not harmless, we vacate and remand.
I. BACKGROUND
The evidence at trial demonstrated that from 1989 to 1992 several companies were established to market oil and gas drilling projects. The projects were marketed through the use of written prospectuses sent by mail to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Andrade v. ChojnackiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Marina Medina Marco Antonio Martinez Javier Alberto DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.