State v. Michael Rondeau
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentReiber, C.J.
¶ 56. Defendant’s conviction for aggravated sexual assault based on repeated nonconsensual sexual acts should stand. Although the information cited the incorrect statute and contained superfluous information, it provided defendant with *547notice of all elements of the correct charge. Defendant can point to no way in which he was prejudiced in the preparation and presentation of his defense. He knew all elements of the charge, the jury determined those facts against him, and he was sentenced according to the correct statutory range. Therefore, I would affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Erwin Manget Enzor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Robert W. KenningtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. BowersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.