Legal Opinion

Frago v. City of Irondale

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 11, 1954No. 43427PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOZIER, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs sued to cancel tax bills, totaling $10,202.75, issued by defendant city against plaintiffs’ properties for street work. Plaintiffs have appealed from an adverse judgment. This court has jurisdiction as the record affirmatively shows that the “amount in dispute, exclusive of costs,” exceeds $7,-500. Art. V, § 3, Const., 2 V.A.M.S.; Cooper v. School District of Kansas City, 362 Mo. 49, 239 S.W.2d 509.

Plaintiffs-appellants here contend that the ordinances under which the tax bills were issued unlawfully proyided that the costs of the work be paid out of the city’s…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Beverly Hills v. SchulterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Cooper v. School District of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Barkwell v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Steiger v. City of Ste. GenevieveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Barton County Rock Asphalt v. City of Fayette, Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cimasi v. City of FentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Krug v. Village of Mary RidgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. City of Independence ex rel. Guinn v. HareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Adams v. City of ManchesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Missouri Public Service Co. v. Barton County Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API