Legal Opinion

Carter v. State Board of Alcoholic Control

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1968No. 519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the rules of this Court this appeal must have been docketed by 10 o’clock A.M. on 3 October 1967. Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 785.

In the case of Owens v. Boling, 274 N.C. 374, 163 S.E. 2d 396, this Court stated:

“Counsel may not waive the rules of this Court. In re Suggs, 238 N.C. 413, 78 S.E. 2d 157; Jones v. Jones, 232 N.C. 518, 61 S.E. 2d 335; State v. Butner, 185 N.C. 731, 117 S.E. 163. Consequently, it was beyond the authority of the attorneys to bypass a term. Mimms v. R. R., 183 N.C. 436, 111 S.E. 778. ‘The rules of practice in the Supreme Court are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . ButnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Stone v. . LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Mimms v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Kernodle v. BoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DarrahSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Robert E. Harris Evangelistic Ass'n v. Board of Tax SupervisionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API