Legal Opinion
Scott v. Village of Spring Valley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 5, 2014No. 13-3910-cv(L), 13-4297-cv(con)UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Don Shirley Rowe Scott, the plaintiff in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against defendants the County of Rockland, Village of Spring Valley, and the Village’s police department, appeals from an order denying him leave to amend his complaint to add Officers Joseph Brown and Oscar Lopez (the “officers”) as named defendants because his claims against the officers do not relate back to the original complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c)(1) and are, therefore, untimely. 1 We review de novo the district court’s relation-back determination. See ASARCO LLC v. Goodwin, 756 F.3d 191, 202-03 (2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hogan v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Asarco LLC v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dacosta v. City of N.Y.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Leber v. Citigroup 401(k) Plan Investment CommitteeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Owens v. VHS Acqusition Subsidiary Number 3, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Lin v. JoedyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- (PC) Cox v. KrpinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.