Legal Opinion

(PC) Cox v. Krpin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 14, 2023No. 2:18-cv-02523Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., No. 2:18-cv-02523 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JOHN KRPIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant was deliberately indifferent to his 19 serious medical needs. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 20 57.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API