Legal Opinion
Finnegan v. Brothman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and new trial granted on first and second causes of action only in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for a directed verdict on the first and second causes of action alleging medical malpractice and negligence. John F. Finnegan, Jr. (plaintiff) received insurance benefits from New York Central Mutual Insurance Company (NYCM) as a result of a motor vehicle accident on April 11, 1992. Prior to a scheduled surgery on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LoDico v. CaputiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Murphy v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Smith v. PasquarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Roth v. TuckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Lacy v. Guthrie Clinic, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Polidoro v. Chubb Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Savarese v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Polidoro v. Chubb Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Zoeller v. Attica Lodge 462 F&AMAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000