Legal Opinion

Darnell v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1910No. 21,379PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (16,391); Henry Clay Allen, Judge. Suit by The State of Indiana against Isaac M. Darnell and another. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal. For decision on appeal to United States Supreme Court, see — U. S. —.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a suit in equity, brought by the State, in its capacity as a sovereign and as parens patriae and trustee for all the peopleMnd the political subdivisions of the State, to recover from Isaac M. Darnell $12,000 for taxes on property omitted from taxation, to set aside a fraudulent conveyance of real estate, to foreclose the State’s lien for taxes against such real estate, and for the appointment of a receiver. Emma Darnell voluntarily appeared, and on application was made a party defendant, and ^hereupon made claim of ownership to certain personal property mentioned in the complaint.…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Brown v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Bayonne v. Murphy & Perrett Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Citizens & Southern Bank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. In re Indianapolis Downs, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  4. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. FelixIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Murphy v. Jos. Hollander, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API