Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stensby Ex Rel. Stensby v. McClelland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiiRistiaNsoN, J.

Ole Stensby petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of his minor son,' Alf Stensby. The material and undisputed facts, as stated in tbe petition for tbe writ, are as follows: *

“That said Alf Stensby, in whose behalf this petition (writ) is applied for, is a minor son of your petitioner herein; that said Alf Stensby is now restrained of his liberty and is kept and confined in the state training school at Mandan, in the county of Morton, state of North Dakota, by the above named defendant, W. F. McClelland, as the superintendent and man in charge of the said state training…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Re SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Neville v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re BlackeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Solberg v. SpicherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Witkowski v. M.D.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sweet v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1959
  3. Depositors Holding Co. v. Ashley State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Interest of MDNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API