Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Stensby Ex Rel. Stensby v. McClelland
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCiiRistiaNsoN, J.
Ole Stensby petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of his minor son,' Alf Stensby. The material and undisputed facts, as stated in tbe petition for tbe writ, are as follows: *
“That said Alf Stensby, in whose behalf this petition (writ) is applied for, is a minor son of your petitioner herein; that said Alf Stensby is now restrained of his liberty and is kept and confined in the state training school at Mandan, in the county of Morton, state of North Dakota, by the above named defendant, W. F. McClelland, as the superintendent and man in charge of the said state training…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Re SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Neville v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re BlackeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Solberg v. SpicherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Witkowski v. M.D.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Sweet v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1959
- Depositors Holding Co. v. Ashley State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- In Interest of MDNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992