Legal Opinion

State v. Spence

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 25, 2001No. CR-00-1321PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

The petitioner, Richard Spence, filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Ray D. Martin to grant his request to proceed in forma pauperis in filing his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief. Spence was convicted of trafficking in a controlled substance. We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. See Spence v. State, (No. CR-94-0575) 683 So.2d 64 (Ala.Crim.App.1995) (table). In February 2001, Spence filed a Rule 32 petition attacking his conviction. The petition was accompanied by a request to proceed in forma pauperis. See Rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte FerrellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cook v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  2. Ex parte William Keith Robey.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. Ex parte William Keith Robey.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API