Legal Opinion

Consentino v. Vittoria

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1959No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

This is an appeal from the action of the court below in refusing to remove a compulsory nonsuit entered against the appellants, Palmerino and Carmella Consentino, in an assumpsit action against Frances Vittoria, executrix of the estate of Carmine Pecchio, to recover for nursing and housekeeping services allegedly rendered by Mrs. Consentino to the decedent Pecchio during his lifetime.

Carmine Pecchio, a native of Italy, resided in Am-bridge, Pa., and had been acquainted with appellants during most of the time that he had been a resident of that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gilbraith's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Mooney's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Gregory's Exrs. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Stewart v. HOOKSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Flaccus v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fahringer v. Strine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Hatbob v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Friedman v. SchoolmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Firetree, Ltd. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Gadola EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API