Legal Opinion

Cortez Washington v. Warden Guzman, et al.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 13, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02007Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORTEZ WASHINGTON, Case No.: 25cv2007-DMS (BLM) CDCR #AI-3100, 12 ORDER: Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS 14 AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS WARDEN GUZMAN, et al., 15 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE Defendants. RLUIPA, BANE ACT, AND FIRST 16 AND FOURTH AMENDMENT 17 CLAIMS AGAINST GUZMAN, and 18 (2) PROVIDING PLAINTIFF WITH 19 THE OPTION OF AMENDING OR PROCEEDING ONLY AGAINST 20 DEFENDANT GUZMAN 21 22 Plaintiff Cortez Washington is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 23 action pursuant to 42…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API