Rosick v. Morey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
We do not reach the merits of this controversy if the motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal is to be *81granted. He contends that the court’s action may not be treated as a judgment because it is not “a final determination of the rights of the parties,” sec. 270.53 (1), Stats., and that if it is to be treated as an order it does not “in effect determine the action and prevent a judgment from which an appeal might be taken,” sec. 274.33 (1); also that the objectors are not parties aggrieved by the action of the court, and that, consequently, this court is without jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Will of EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Dromey v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Estate of Read v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Will of DurkeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dillon v. DillonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Strandberg v. StrandbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of DanielsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Estate of HertzfeldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Estate of Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.