Martel v. Collins
Charlottesville County Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge Edward L. Hogshire
After obtaining a jury verdict, the Plaintiff has moved for costs under Va. Code §§ 14.1-178 and 14.1-198.1 Upon reviewing the briefs and authorities submitted by the parties, the Court concludes that the Plaintiff’s motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
The Defendant contends that the statutes providing for costs should be construed narrowly because they are in derogation of the common law. However, the case that the Defendant cites for this proposition, Jones v. Brown, 39 Va. Cir. 256 (1996), acknowledges that “[t]he discretion given the court to tax…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Advanced Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. PRC Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Commonwealth v. McCue's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- University Support Services, Inc. v. GalvinFairfax County Circuit Court · 1993
- Tico, Inc. v. ZenzFairfax County Circuit Court · 1989
- Jones v. BrownNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rogers v. WilliamsDanville County Circuit Court · 2005