Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Griffith

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 20, 1998No. 97-P-0422PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

It was not a good start. Asked to proceed with his opening, the prosecutor1 began: “Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, I’d like to introduce Paul Griffith, an individual who peddles drugs here in the City of Springfield, commonly referred to as a drug dealer.” That was rather much to say about a defendant charged with a single count of distributing marijuana (G. L. c. 94C, § 32C), as compared with trafficking in marijuana. (G. L. c. 94C, § 32E). We inquire whether an aggregation of excesses by the prosecutor, most not objected to by the defense, deprived the defendant of a fair trial.

Having…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. YesilcimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BorodineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. CiampaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. DeloneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. State v. BarfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. FredetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API