Commonwealth v. Griffith
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
It was not a good start. Asked to proceed with his opening, the prosecutor1 began: “Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, I’d like to introduce Paul Griffith, an individual who peddles drugs here in the City of Springfield, commonly referred to as a drug dealer.” That was rather much to say about a defendant charged with a single count of distributing marijuana (G. L. c. 94C, § 32C), as compared with trafficking in marijuana. (G. L. c. 94C, § 32E). We inquire whether an aggregation of excesses by the prosecutor, most not objected to by the defense, deprived the defendant of a fair trial.
Having…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. YesilcimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. BorodineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. CiampaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ColonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. DeloneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SheehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- State v. BarfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. FredetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.