Foote v. Percy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Petition for an injunction against the taking out and levying of an execution on a judgment obtained by the respondents against the petitioners; brought to the Superior Coul’t in New Haven County, and heard before Phelps, J. The petition alleged that the petitioners' on- the 2d day of February, 1856, made an assignment of all their property for the benefit of their creditors under the insolvent law of the state, and on the 18th day of February, 1857, obtained under the…
Read the full summary
Petition for an injunction against the taking out and levying of an execution on a judgment obtained by the respondents against the petitioners; brought to the Superior Coul’t in New Haven County, and heard before Phelps, J. The petition alleged that the petitioners' on- the 2d day of February, 1856, made an assignment of all their property for the benefit of their creditors under the insolvent law of the state, and on the 18th day of February, 1857, obtained under the then.existing law a full discharge by the court of probate from all their indebtedness existing on the 2d day of February,…
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
On the second of February, 1856, the plaintiffs made an assignment in the court of probate, for the district of New Haven, under our statute for the benefit of their creditors, and on the 13th of February, 1857, they obtained the usual discharge. The defendants during the progress of these proceedings, obtained a judgment against the plaintiffs *89in 1856, at the September term of the Superior Court for the county of Litchfield, for the sum of $492110% debt, and 1161% costs of suit. In 1868, at the April term of the Superior Court for the county of Litchfield, the defendants brought an action of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Percy v. FooteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Waterman v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cottiero v. IfkovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994