Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Jackson & Nash
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 27, 1991No. 91 Civ. 2535 (CSH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Plaintiff Victoria A. Stewart, an attorney, was terminated on December 31, 1990 from her employment as an associate at the defendant law firm of Jackson & Nash (the “Firm”). The individual defendants are partners of the Firm. Stewart commenced this diversity action against defendants alleging causes of action in fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Defendants move under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Plaintiff alleges that until October 1988…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stewart v. Jackson & NashCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Stewart v. Jackson & NashCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992