Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. New York Life Insurance

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 24, 1956Published

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

This is a motion made by the defendant, pursuant to the provisions of rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for partial summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action set forth in the complaint herein.

*778Plaintiff instituted this action for judgment upon two life insurance policies containing provisions for disability benefits for payments alleged to be due in accordance with such provisions. We are not presently concerned with the first cause of action, as it is conceded that there are both factual and legal issues to be determined. However, defendant urges that the clear,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Perlman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Berke v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. McGuinness v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API