Legal Opinion
['ALKASABI v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.']
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-2021PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[#4]
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Osama A. Alkasabi and Nadia Haddada, proceeding pro se, brought this suit against defendants Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., Washington Mutual Bank (together, “WAMU”), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for WAMU, in connection with plaintiffs’ purchase of two condominiums in La Jolla, California. See generally Compl. [Dkt. # 1], Plaintiffs, borrowers from WAMU, a failed bank, allege that WAMU misrepresented that Certificates of Occupancy for the properties would be issued by the city…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sandza v. Barclays Bank PLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kuhlmann v. Sabal Financial Group LPDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Feldman v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Capitol Services Management Inc. v. Vesta CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Lee v. Foris Dax, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.