Legal Opinion
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 18, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-5150PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
This is an action brought by the Republic of the Philippines and the National Power Corporation (“NPC”), the Philippine government agency responsible for electric power generation, against Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“WECOR”), a Pennsylvania corporation, Westinghouse International Projects Company (“WIPCO”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of WECOR (these entities are sometimes referred to collectively as “Westinghouse”) and Burns and Roe Enterprises, Inc. (“Burns & Roe”), a New Jersey corporation. This case arises out of the construction of the 600-mega-watt…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- The Republic Of The Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ZimmermanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Republic of the PhilippinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Levitt v. Riddell Sports, Inc. (In Re MacGregor Sporting Goods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Great Western Coal (Kentucky) Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.