Legal Opinion

Bush v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 8, 1920No. 32756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The Reporter’s statement of the case:

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Judge

This case is now before us upon a motion for a new trial under section 175 of the Judicial Code. The gravamen of the motion is an allegation that in view of the absence from the record in this case of an important deposition the court may not have considered the entire record in forming its conclusions.

The facts stated in the present motion are sufficient to arrest the attention of the court. Manifestly both sides to the litigation are entitled to a consideration of the complete record, and it would be a most unusual event if such consideration was not given in view of the fact that the final…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Axman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1912
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Badowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Badowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API