Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. East Nantmeal Township

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 108 and 109PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Claimant, Chester Mitchell, had been employed by J. D. Prosser, a paving contractor for many years. By long experience he had become an expert operator of graders, power rollers and other road building equipment. Prosser on June 12, 1954, as he had done on a number of prior occasions, supplied East Nantmeal Township with a road roller on a flat rate rental basis'. The agreed rental included the services of claimant as operator of the equipment. On the above date after rolling a small patched section of a road, Mitchell, at the direction of the township road supervisor,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Thatcher v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Robson v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. McGrath v. Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blessing v. T. Shriver and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Rugh v. Keystone-Lawrence Transfer & Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Matonti v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Brasel v. Quickway, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API