Michigan Savings Bank v. Estate of Butler
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Appeal from the disallowance of a claim against the estate of decedent. The estate brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 87 Midi. 248.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The bank presented a claim against the estate, based upon a note made by E. K. Roberts, payable to Barnes Bros, or bearer, and by them indorsed in blank. This note was dated October 14, 1889, but, as the testimony shows, was given in renewal of one dated June 11 of the same year. The grounds upon which it is sought to charge the estate of Butler are that Butler was a partner of Roberts in conducting a certain fish business, and that the money was in fact borrowed for the copartnership, and went into the business. The relations existing between Butler, Roberts, and one Gauthier were somewhat…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Purvis v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mills v. RiggleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Smith v. Stock Yards Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Beckwith v. MaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Harper v. CorcoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Amunategui v. Spokane Cattle Loan Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.