United States v. Parker
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Michael E. Parker appeals his two-count conviction and resulting 85-month sentence for using a cell phone to convey false information about alleged attempts to blow up certain buildings. He argues that (1) the district court abused its discretion in admitting voice-identification evidence; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdicts; and (3) the sentence is procedurally unreasonable. Our jurisdiction arises under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Background
On the morning of April 19, 2007, between 5:15 a.m. and 8:09 a.m., the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Castoreno-JaimeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. DeberryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gambino-ZavalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. EgbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Tiffany MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. John MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.