Legal Opinion

United States v. Parker

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 16, 2008No. 07-3364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Michael E. Parker appeals his two-count conviction and resulting 85-month sentence for using a cell phone to convey false information about alleged attempts to blow up certain buildings. He argues that (1) the district court abused its discretion in admitting voice-identification evidence; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdicts; and (3) the sentence is procedurally unreasonable. Our jurisdiction arises under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Background

On the morning of April 19, 2007, between 5:15 a.m. and 8:09 a.m., the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Castoreno-JaimeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. DeberryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Gambino-ZavalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. EgbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Tiffany MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. John MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API