Harrigan & Reid Co. v. Hudson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.
Plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the plumbing and heating business, sued defendants, husband and wife, for balance claimed to be due for services and materials furnished in the construction of a house. On trial before a jury, it received a verdict for $1,009. On motion, the trial court entered a judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
In August, 1936, defendant owners, planning the building of a home, employed Keyes as architect. The terms of such employment are in writing and provided that Keyes was to perform the following services:
1. Proceed with…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ward v. DunnebeckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rohe Scientific Corp. v. National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Redd and Hill v. L & a Contracting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Brown v. OldhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955