Legal Opinion

Harrigan & Reid Co. v. Hudson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1939No. Docket No. 133, Calendar No. 40,780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the plumbing and heating business, sued defendants, husband and wife, for balance claimed to be due for services and materials furnished in the construction of a house. On trial before a jury, it received a verdict for $1,009. On motion, the trial court entered a judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

In August, 1936, defendant owners, planning the building of a home, employed Keyes as architect. The terms of such employment are in writing and provided that Keyes was to perform the following services:

1. Proceed with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. DunnebeckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rohe Scientific Corp. v. National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Redd and Hill v. L & a Contracting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Brown v. OldhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API