Legal Opinion

de Lange v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 3, 1976No. C.D. 4631; Court Nos. 69/7589, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

He, Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the dutiable status, for tariff purposes, of certain merchandise imported by plaintiff from Holland in 1967 and 1968. The merchandise, consisting of grain, was invoiced as “quick cooking pearl barley.” It was classified by the Customs Service under item 131.12 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as milled “barley: other” .fit for human consumption, and assessed with duty at 2 cents per spound.

Plaintiff challenges the classification and claims, alternatively, that ‘the merchandise is properly classifiable either as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Goldfarb v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Nishimoto Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. Nishimoto Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. NEC America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API