Legal Opinion

Bethea v. Allen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 30, 1913No. 8659PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before C. J. Ramage, special Judge, Dillon. Action by B. P. Bethea et al. against J. Furman Allen et al. Plaintiff appeals. cites: As to delivery of deed: 2 Hill Ch. 600, 629; 4 McC. 198; Bail. Eq. 141; 2 Speer 75; 9 Rich. Eq. 303; 10 Rich. Eq. 212. Effect of registration and probate: Rice Eq. 243. Adverse possession: McM.

Read the full summary

Before C. J. Ramage, special Judge, Dillon. Action by B. P. Bethea et al. against J. Furman Allen et al. Plaintiff appeals. cites: As to delivery of deed: 2 Hill Ch. 600, 629; 4 McC. 198; Bail. Eq. 141; 2 Speer 75; 9 Rich. Eq. 303; 10 Rich. Eq. 212. Effect of registration and probate: Rice Eq. 243. Adverse possession: McM. Eq. 157. Estoppel by recitals in deed: 1 McC. 85. One holding under deed cannot deny its validity: 16 Cyc. 706; 75 Tex. 506. Duty of mortgagee in possession: 27 Cyc. 1237; 24 Minn. 221. cites: Recording mortgages: 87 S. C. 120. Delivery of deed must be proved: 44 S. C. 372;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

Parker Bethea and his wife died leaving a large tract of land. In the division among their children lot No. 4 was set aside to1 Elizabeth Henderson, a daughter. Elizabeth had no children and lived with her two sisters, Laura Jane Bethea and Maria L. Bethea, in the family home on lot No. 4. On the 6th day of January, 1871, Elizabeth signed the following paper:

“State of South Carolina, County of Marion.

Know all men by these presents that I, Elizabeth E. Henderson, for and in consideration of the natural live (sic) and affection I bear…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Copeland v. CraigSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Bethea v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  3. Clarke v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API