Legal Opinion

Herminghausen v. Adams Express Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 5, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. H. Bank, Jr., Judge. The trial eourt sustained a demurrer to count 3 of plaintiff’s petition. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

I. The original petition was in two counts, which are not set out in the abstract. By way of amendment to petition, plaintiff filed a third count, substantially as follows : That on April 27, 1909, at Montrose, Iowa, he delivered to the defendant one jack, crated, for shipment to Weiner, Ark., and on delivery of said jack he paid the express charges in full as given to him by the.agent of the defendant company *232at Montrose in the sum of $28; that when the jack arrived at Weiner delivery thereof was refused to the plaintiff until a claim for charges in the sum of $102.50 should be paid; that in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. C. H. Albers Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cisco Oil MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McDannel v. Parkview Investment CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. Bowen Motor Coaches, Inc. v. New York Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  3. T. Richter & Sons v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Foley v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. F. Burkart Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API