Legal Opinion

State v. Tanner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1987No. TC 84-0973; CA A36777; SC S33523Published

1Opinion of the Court

745 P.2d 757 (1987)

304 Or. 312

STATE of Oregon, Respondent On Review,

v.

William Calvin TANNER, Petitioner On Review.

TC 84-0973; CA A36777; SC S33523.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted March 4, 1987.

Decided November 17, 1987.

Raymond F. Thomas, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief was Royce, Swanson & Thomas, Portland.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review.

LENT, Justice.

The issue is whether one who entrusts an effect to another has a right under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Campbell; Concurrence · Gillette; Dissent · Peterson; Dissent · Jones.

2Cases cited96 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API