Legal Opinion

Willoughby v. Port

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 30, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion by two of a five-man board of directors of Great Sweet Grass Oils Limited, a Canadian corporation, for a preliminary injunction against the voting of proxies alleged to have been obtained by fraud from the stockholders. It is charged that a letter soliciting the proxies contained misstatements as to the attitude of Mr. George Brussel, American counsel for the corporation. Mr. Brussel had written a letter dated February 12, 1960, to Mr. James H. R. Cromwell, the president of the corporation, respecting a proposed financing arrangement with Mr. Nicholas…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wyatt v. ArmstrongNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. SteinbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  3. Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Dal-Tran Service Co. v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. Skora v. Great Sweet Grass Oils, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API