Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1996No. 95-067Published

1Opinion of the Court

926 P.2d 717 (1996)

STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Aaron D. ROMERO, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 95-067.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs April 11, 1996.

Decided November 6, 1996.

Jack E. Sands, Billings, for Defendant and Appellant.

Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, Cregg Coughlin, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Christine A. Cook, County Attorney, Curtis L. Bevolden, Deputy Big Horn County Attorney, Hardin, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

NELSON, Justice.

Aaron D. Romero (Romero) appeals from the judgment entered by the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Big Horn…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API