Sonil v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Opinion by

Stadtpeld, J.,

The plaintiff obtained a verdict against the defendant company in an action of trespass. Defendant filed no motion for a new trial, but only a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. The court overruled this motion in an opinion by Marshall (T. M.), J. From the judgment entered on the verdict, this appeal was taken.

In the disposition of the motion for judgment n. o. v. all facts, and the inferences reasonably to be drawn from them, must be resolved in favor of plaintiff.

At the time of the accident, the plaintiff, a minor, aged about nineteen years, at 8:15 in the…