Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Bornstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1995No. Docket Nos. B083779, B071822PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Plaintiff Kathryn Castaneda brought this medical malpractice action against the physicians who provided her with care and treatment before, during, and immediately after her birth. She alleged defendants’ negligence caused her to suffer brain damage which resulted in mental retardation. The trial court granted a nonsuit in favor of defendant Machikawa, the consulting “OB/GYN” and defendant Wang, a pediatrician who treated plaintiff immediately after her birth. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Bornstein, a family medicine specialist who provided the primary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PrideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kennemur v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Morgenroth v. Pacific Medical Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Bonds v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Stonegate Homeowners Ass'n v. StabenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Basham v. BabcockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API