Legal Opinion

United States v. Schuk

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-612PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

Claiming that defendant knowingly concealed relevant biographical data from his application for citizenship, the Government instituted this denaturalization proceeding. 8 U.S.C. § 1451. Specifically, the complaint charges that defendant failed to disclose his participation, between 1941-1944, in the execution of hundreds of Jews in the Nazi-occupied Gorodische region of the Ukraine. Defendant, moving to dismiss, argues that the affidavit appended to the complaint, 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a), impermissibly relies upon hearsay information rather than the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. Morris WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. ZuccaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. Frank Walus, A/K/A Franciszek WalusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Nowak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Thi Marilyn DangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Ferenc KorehCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Juozas KungysCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. SchifferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. United States v. AkhterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API