United States v. Schuk
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Claiming that defendant knowingly concealed relevant biographical data from his application for citizenship, the Government instituted this denaturalization proceeding. 8 U.S.C. § 1451. Specifically, the complaint charges that defendant failed to disclose his participation, between 1941-1944, in the execution of hundreds of Jews in the Nazi-occupied Gorodische region of the Ukraine. Defendant, moving to dismiss, argues that the affidavit appended to the complaint, 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a), impermissibly relies upon hearsay information rather than the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Morris WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. ZuccaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Frank Walus, A/K/A Franciszek WalusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Nowak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Thi Marilyn DangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Ferenc KorehCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Juozas KungysCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. SchifferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- United States v. AkhterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.