Legal Opinion

Castile v. Burton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1946No. 15481PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petitioner by the averments of her petition bases her claim to the strip of land in controversy, first upon the deed dated January 30, 1924, which expressly fixes the southern boundary of the land therein conveyed as the city limits of the City of Marietta, and secondly upon 20-years adverse possession under that deed. It is at once quite obvious that, in order to be entitled to recover in virtue of her deed title, it was incumbent upon the petitioner to establish by evidence the location of the city limits of the City of Marietta at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Atlanta Railway & Power Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Farmer v. DavenportSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pate v. Seaboard RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Maurer v. ChyatteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Whitfield v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Weathers v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Lewis v. Seaboard RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API