Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fowler v. Donnelly

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1960Published

1DissentO’Connell, J.

The majority opinion disposes of this case upon a ground which was neither presented in the court below nor argued on appeal. The defendant’s demurrer was interposed to test the sufficiency of the complaint, not on the ground that it failed to allege the falsity of the alleged defamatory statement, but on the ground that the statement was not libelous. In fact, in the oral argument defendant’s counsel conceded that “by demurring we admit that it [the alleged defamatory statement] was false.” Plaintiff’s counsel now learns for the first time that in an action of libel a complaint is fatally…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Comerford v. MeierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Glenn v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Fritschle v. Kettle River Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Thomas v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hand v. HandAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API