Legal Opinion

People v. Montano

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 22, 1978No. 27900, 27947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

The prosecution perfected this appeal pursuant to section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973. The defendant, John James Montano, has been in jeopardy, and, therefore, this appeal serves only to point out as a matter of law the impropriety and the error which occurred when the trial judge dismissed the prosecution’s case. See Krutka v. Spinuzzi, 153 Colo. 115, 384 P.2d 928 (1963). We disapprove of the trial judge’s grounds for granting a judgment of acquittal and dismissing the prosecution’s case.

The facts are not in dispute. John James Montano had a passing acquaintanceship with the victim and her late…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Corbett v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Krutka v. SpinuzziSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. People v. DennisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. CaldwellColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. TorresColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. OramColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. NogaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. People in Interest of THSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API