Legal Opinion
United States v. Ricardo Rusan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 22, 2006No. 05-4446PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Ricardo Rusan appeals his convictions for bank robbery and bank larceny pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (b), contending that the district court 1 erred in denying his Batson 2 challenge to the Government’s use of peremptory strikes during jury selection and that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the bank involved was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). After careful review, we affirm.
I
During the morning hours of November 12, 2004, a man wearing a skull cap and sunglasses and carrying a backpack entered a branch of the Southern…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Stephen W. BentsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Lohman Ray Mays, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. MarstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Lamar Chapman, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. AyewohCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Honken v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.