Legal Opinion

Taser International, Inc. v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 13, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0468PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant Steve Ward appeals from the entry of partial summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff Taser International. He argues that partial summary judgment should be entered in his favor, or, alternatively, that issues of material fact preclude summary judgment in favor of Taser. Por the following reasons, we reverse the entry of partial summary judgment, direct entry of summary judgment in part in favor of Ward, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Taser International develops and manufactures electronic control devices, commonly called…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. FIRETRACE USA, LLC v. JesclardDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  2. Joshua David Mellberg LLC v. WillDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  3. Sitton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. ETrade Fin. Corp. v. EatonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
  5. Industrial Commission v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API