Legal Opinion
California v. Texas
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided September 9, 1982No. 88 ORIGPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
In this motion, California seeks leave to file a complaint against Texas under this Court’s original jurisdiction. The proposed complaint asks us to decide whether Howard Hughes was domiciled in California or Texas at the time of his death. The decision about domicile could determine which State is entitled to levy death taxes on the estate.
This motion renews the one which California made in November 1977. At that time, we denied leave to file. Cali*165fornia v. Texas, 437 U. S. 601 (1978). Following the suggestion of four Justices who concurred in California v. Texas, the estate then sought a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Worcester County Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Alabama v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- AmGuard Insurance Company v. SG Patel and Sons II LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Dean and Martha Lowe v. Joseph C. and Joyce A. RichardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Horizon Bank and Trust Co. v. FlahertyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.