Legal Opinion
Alabama v. Arizona
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 5, 1934PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
For the purpose of invoking original jurisdiction as “ to Controversies between two or more States ” (Const., Art. Ill, •§ 2) Alabama lodged with the clerk and applied for •leave to file a complaint against 19 States praying that the court adjudge invalid, because in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution, statutes by them respectively enacted to regulate or prohibit sales of . articles produced by convict labor and an Act of Congress approved January 19, 1929, 45 Stat. 1084, effective January 19, 1934, to divest in certain cases such products of. ’ théir interstate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Connecticut v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Application of the President and Directors of Georgetown College, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Colorado v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.