Legal Opinion

Nash v. Adams

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 15, 1855PublishedCited by 16 opinions

This was an action on the case, brought to the term of the superior court for the county of New London, holden in September, 1851. The declaration originally contained three counts.

Read the full summary

This was an action on the case, brought to the term of the superior court for the county of New London, holden in September, 1851. The declaration originally contained three counts. In the first count, it was alleged that the defendants were carriers of goods and chattels for him from the city of Norwich, in the state of Connecticut, to the city of Philadelphia, in the state of Pennsylvania, and that on the 8th day of October, 1850, the plaintiff delivered to them a bag containing 207 oz. and 10. pwts. of placer gold, marked U. S. Mint, Pa., to be conveyed from said Norwich to the U. S. Mint…

1Opinion of the CourtStorrs, J.

The objection urged against the amendment of the declaration in this case is, that it changed the ground of the action ; its form was confessedly preserved. The statutes of amendment, and the decisions upon them, in other states, which have been very elaborately examined by the *38defendants’ counsel, obviously furnish but little light for our guidance in expounding our own statute on that subject. Ours is a very ancient law, and has continually been more and more liberally expounded, so as to further the beneficial purpose intended by it, which was to prevent the plaintiff from being put to a…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. West v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Dunnett v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  3. Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Simpson v. Enfield Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Johnston v. SikesConnecticut Superior Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API