Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
*341OPINION
WREN, Judge.
This appeal challenges the constitutionality of a Scottsdale ordinance which levied upon all developers a water development charge in the minimum amount of $400 per dwelling unit on all units for which building permits were obtained after the effective date of the ordinance. Appellants complain that the ordinance is unconstitutional on its face in that it violates principles of equal protection under both our State and Federal Constitutions.
Appellants assert that the ordinance, by focusing on the time of obtaining a building permit rather than connecting to the water…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Beauty Built Construction Corp. v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Associated Homebuilders of the Greater East Bay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Starline Construction Co. v. City of Swartz CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Carpio v. Tucson High School Dist. No. 1 of Pima Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fred Nackard Land Co. v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010