Legal Opinion
Thomas Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2017No. 11-56843PublishedCited by 230 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
On remand from the Supreme Court, we must determine whether an alleged violation of a consumer’s rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act constitutes a harm sufficiently concrete to satisfy the injury-in-fact requirement of Article III of the United States Constitution.
I
A
Spokeo, Inc., operates a website by the same name that compiles consumer data and builds individual consumer-information profiles. At no cost, consumers can use spokeo.com to view a report containing an array of details about a person’s life, such as the person’s age, contact information,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Paula Casillas v. Madison Avenue Associates, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Long v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Christine Bryant v. Compass Group U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Chad Eichenberger v. Espn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Nimesh Patel v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.