Legal Opinion
Chad Eichenberger v. Espn, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 29, 2017No. 15-35449PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Chad Eichenberger alleges that Defendant ESPN, Inc. violated the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (“VPPA”), which bars a “video tape service provider” from knowingly disclosing “personally identifiable information concerning any consumer of such provider.” 18 U.S.C. § 2710(b)(1). The district court dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the ground that the operative complaint fails to state a claim that the information disclosed was “personally identifiable information” within the meaning of the VPPA. We affirm.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Nimesh Patel v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Campbell v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Freshta Nayab v. Capital One Bank (Usa), NaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Steven Bassett v. Abm Parking ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.